![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Judge Ellis found that the statute did provide an enforcement mechanism for injunctive and equitable relief, but did not limit it to these forms of relief. The City of Chicago alleges that the defendants violated the Municipal Code of Chicago against the advertisement and sale of tobacco products to minors as well as the newer regulation prohibiting the sale of flavored liquid tobacco products.ĭefendants argued that the pertinent city code only allowed the city to seek injunctive or equitable relief, not monetary damages in the form of fines. Ellis, in a lawsuit filed by the City of Chicago, denied a motion to dismiss brought by the defendant vape company Equte LLC/Vapes.Com and the owner Jeffrey Evenmo. Oblak, Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered, Richard Zachary Wolf, Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered & William James Quinn, Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP, pro hac vice.On JJudge Sara L. ![]() Bagg, Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP, pro hac vice, Katherine H. Vibes Media, LLC, Defendant, represented by Amy Elizabeth Richardson, Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP, pro hac vice, Basileios Katris, Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered, Jennifer P. Goldhaber, Hawkins, Parnell, Thackston & Young, LLP & Matthew Steven Dowling, Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP. Madeleine Yates, on behalf of herself and other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Roberto Luis Costales, Beaumont Costales, Jonathan Mille Kirkland, Beaumont Costales LLC & William Henry Beaumont, Beaumont Costales LLC.Ĭheckers Drive-in Restaurants, Inc., Defendant, represented by Abigail Marie Lyle, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Jarrett Lee Hale, Hunton & Williams Llp, Tara Leigh Elgie, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Catherine E. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |